Party Deputy Eihab Hamada Responds to Accusations with Pointed Comparison

A senior member of the party has pushed back against allegations of foreign allegiances, offering a provocative counterargument to critics.

Deputy Eihab Hamada challenged the narrative that his party harbors Iranian sympathies, contending that if such characterizations were valid, then certain political opponents could similarly be labeled as Israeli-aligned. The deputy presented this as a reductio ad absurdum—suggesting that applying such blanket attributions would be equally unfair to all sides.

The statement reflects ongoing tensions within Lebanon's political landscape, where questions of foreign influence and national loyalty remain contentious. Hamada's remarks underscore the polarized nature of political discourse, with competing groups accusing one another of prioritizing external powers over domestic interests.

The deputy's intervention comes amid broader debates about the role of external actors in shaping Lebanese politics and policy.