Iran Denounces US Military Operations as Violation of Ceasefire and International Law

Iran's government has issued a sharp rebuke of what it characterizes as systematic American violations of the ceasefire agreement, following military strikes that struck targets in Bandar Abbas in the early morning hours on Thursday.

Ismail Baghaei, spokesman for Iran's Foreign Ministry, delivered a formal condemnation of what he termed "American military aggression against areas in Bandar Abbas." He framed the operations as direct affronts to Iran's territorial integrity and national sovereignty, arguing they constitute a "flagrant violation of international law and the United Nations Charter."

Baghaei called upon the UN Security Council to exercise its authority and hold the United States accountable for these actions. He catalogued what Tehran views as a pattern of American transgressions, citing repeated ceasefire violations including attacks targeting commercial shipping throughout the Gulf region and recent aerial operations conducted against Iran's southern territories.

The Foreign Ministry spokesman reaffirmed Iran's commitment to safeguarding its national sovereignty across all of its territory, invoking Article 51 of the UN Charter, which permits states to exercise self-defense rights.

Beyond military concerns, Baghaei also addressed threatening rhetoric emanating from American officials directed at Iran and other regional states. He extended Tehran's backing to Oman, describing the sultanate as a "friendly and brotherly country." Baghaei characterized the threats against Oman—a UN member state that has maintained a constructive diplomatic posture and served as a regional mediator for years—as particularly troubling. He contended that such threats breach the fundamental prohibition against coercion in international relations and signal an alarming trend toward normalizing lawlessness in global affairs.

The escalating tensions reflect a broader confrontation between Washington and Tehran centered on military operations near Bandar Abbas, disagreements over ceasefire compliance, and competing interests regarding navigation security in the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz. Oman's traditional role as a neutral diplomatic intermediary adds another layer of complexity to the regional standoff, making threats directed at Muscat a potential catalyst for further destabilization in an already volatile area.